|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Goals for this session
- Understand assessment terminology
- Understand the different types of goals and student outcomes
- Consider methods of obtaining feedback about accomplishment of student
learning goals
- Become familiar with various ways of using assessment information
|
|
3
|
- “A process that asks important questions about student learning,
gathers some meaningful information on these questions, and uses the
information for academic improvement.”
- Source: Sinclair Community College, as referred to by Denney, 1996 in
Palamba and Danta’s Assessment Essentials. 1999.
|
|
4
|
- “A rich conversation about student learning informed by
data.”
- Source: Ted Marchese, American Association for Higher Education
|
|
5
|
- How well do student outcomes match the goals we have established?
- What experiences will students have as a result of completing their
general education requirements?
- Is what we say we want students to learn (in our mission statement) what
they actually learn (curriculum)?
|
|
6
|
- How is what Cumberland students learn unique? How can we demonstrate it?
- What value does University of the Cumberlands add to students’
acquisition of knowledge, skills, and attitudes?
- What impact does the University have on changes in students during their
four years here? How do we know?
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- Content:
- Knowledge of a subject matter (Cognitive Learning)
- Skill Acquisition:
- Comprehension of a topic, demonstration of a competency, etc.
(Behavioral Learning)
- Attitudes:
- Awareness, interest, concern, etc. (Affective Learning)
- *Outcomes may be a combination of content knowledge, skills, and
attitudes.
|
|
10
|
- Examples of Direct Measures:
- Subject tests (ETS field tests, Academic Profile, etc.)
- Portfolios
- Coursework in Capstone Courses/Senior Projects
|
|
11
|
- Examples of Indirect Measures:
- Feedback from internship, co-op, or student teaching supervisors
- Students’ self reports of knowledge gained
|
|
12
|
- Examples of Direct Measures:
- Juried performance (music, speech, art exhibit, poster session, etc.)
- Portfolios
- Assignments and Coursework in Capstone Courses
|
|
13
|
- Examples of Direct Measures:
- Major Project (research project, major paper, case study, group project)
- Mathematical reasoning tests, foreign language competency tests,
critical thinking tests, etc.
|
|
14
|
- Examples of Indirect Measures:
- Feedback from internship, co-op, or student teaching supervisors
- Students’ self reports of skill attainment
|
|
15
|
- Examples of Direct Measures:
- Survey of students’ responses to value-laden issues
- Test of students’ recognition of and understanding of ethical
issues
|
|
16
|
- Examples of Indirect Measures:
- Feedback from employers, internship supervisors, etc.
- Pre and post tests or surveys that measure changes in attitudes, values,
or beliefs
- Journals, interviews, focus groups
- Surveys of graduates
|
|
17
|
- Alumni, employer and student surveys
- Exit interviews of seniors
- Follow-up studies of graduates
|
|
18
|
- Students, employers, and graduates’ satisfaction ratings
- Number of courses students have completed
- Grades/G.P.A.
- Graduate/professional school acceptance rates
|
|
19
|
- First: Develop goals that address the student outcomes that you want to
achieve.
- Then: Design measures that assess those goals.
- Every goal is measurable.
|
|
20
|
- “I prefer to have soft or rough measures of important goals rather
than highly precise, quantitative measures of goals that no one much
cares about.”
- Source: Patton, Michale. 1997. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New
Century Text, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers 3rd Edition.
|
|
21
|
- Quantitative vs. qualitative measures
- Student evaluations vs. outcome assessment
- Why are grades not a good indicator of student learning?
- The value-added approach to measuring outcomes.
|
|
22
|
- May be based on the previous year’s performance
- (it’s ok to develop baseline data)
- May be based on norms/benchmarks from other comparable programs
(national standards)
- May be based on research from experts in the field (professional
associations, accrediting agencies, etc.)
|
|
23
|
- Should be monitored periodically
- Should be updated when appropriate
|
|
24
|
- Before collecting data, consider what level of knowledge, skill, or
behavior change, etc. is excellent, average, poor.
- Decide, before you conduct the measurement, what the results will mean.
What do the results tell you about achievement of student learning
outcomes?
|
|
25
|
- What are the “cutoff points” that delineate various levels
of goal attainment?
- What level is problematic, requiring additional action?
|
|
26
|
- For example: What if 20% of students indicate that their learning
experiences at Cumberland did not sufficiently prepare them to use
technology in their careers/at graduate school?
- Is this an acceptable level?
- If this is not an acceptable level, what action should be taken in
response
|
|
27
|
- For example: What if 20% of students indicate that their learning
experiences at Cumberland did not sufficiently prepare them to use
technology in their careers/at graduate school?
- What if students indicate that they need additional computer skills and
more refined analytical skills?
- If both are issues that need to be addressed, which should take
priority?
- Faculty can answer these questions more easily by defining the
performance criteria before administering the assessment.
|
|
28
|
- A single instrument can not capture all of the elements of student
learning.
- Goals are not one-dimensional; most programs have multiple goals or
multi-faceted goals for student learning
- Patterns of evidence demonstrate student learning.
- A single measure may be inadequate evidence on which to base accurate
conclusions.
|
|
29
|
- Ongoing
- Manageable (Do not try to do everything at once; assessment can be
phased in over a period of time)
- Faculty use results for decision making
- Student understand their role in assessment
|
|
30
|
- Curriculum in courses
- Pedagogy in courses
- Structure of major, requirements, etc.
- Advising
|
|
31
|
- Best use of resources
- Support for requests for additional resources
- Staffing decisions
|
|
32
|
- Goals for this session:
- Be aware of some of the national trends in assessment.
- Be familiar with research that tells us about assessment and student
learning.
- Become familiar with other institutions’ assessment plans and
procedures.
|
|
33
|
- University-wide and departmental assessment plans should provide
evidence of accomplishment of goals and purposes.
- General education requirements should be consistent with the
institution’s mission and goals.
- Objectives for general education should be explicitly stated and widely
publicized.
|
|
34
|
- Results of the assessment of student learning should be linked to
planning and budgeting. Assessment results should influence
organizational change..
- Faculty clearly understand assessment philosophies and methods and they
should participate in university-wide and program level assessment.
|
|
35
|
- Bottom line:
- SACS wants departments to have a method for ensuring and improving
educational quality
|
|
36
|
- “In a 1995 Campus Trends study, 76% of responding institutions
indicated they had made curriculum or program changes based on
assessment findings.”
- Source: Et-Khawas, Elaine. Higher Education Panel Report, No. 85,
Washington, D.C., American Council on Education.
|
|
37
|
- “Because assessment brings such important information to the
table, the number of (curriculum) changes that are made in the absence
of assessment results should be small.”
- Source: Palomba, Catherine and Trucy Banta. 1999. Assessment Essentials.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
|
|
38
|
- Most institutions’ student learning goals are similar ( for example, communication
skills, critical thinking skills, ability to work in diverse settings,
etc.) but assessment of those goals varies considerable.
|
|
39
|
- *Assessment is integrated into curriculum
- *Assessment is peripheral to development, planning, and budgeting
- *Assessment is conducted across the university
- *Assessment is conducted for curriculum
- *Results are used to improve students’ learning
|
|
40
|
- General education exam (i.e., Academic Profile)
- Writing proficiency exams
- Samples of students’ work (speeches, performances, exhibits, etc.)
- Current student/alumni/employer surveys
- Critical thinking measures
|
|
41
|
- Virginia Tech
- http://fbox.vt.edu:10021/admin/assess/deptrep.html
- Montana State University
- http://www.montana.edu/aircj/assess/majors/majors9899/
- University of Central Arkansas
- http://www.uca.edu/assess/asomdex.htm
|
|
42
|
- Alverno College
- www.alverno.edu
- Truman State University
- www2.truman.edu/assessment98/
- Southeast Missouri State University www2.semo.edu/provost/aspnpg.htm
- Ball State University
- www.bsu.edu/provost/IRAA/index.html
- St. Olaf College
- www.stolaf.edu
|
|
43
|
- Faculty support using assessment data to improve student learning
- Assessment is “built in” to the curriculum.
- Assessment and planning are closely intertwined.
- Students understand assessment and take ownership and interest in their
own learning.
|
|
44
|
- Increasing faculty involvement in assessment.
- Managing the workload implications of conducting assessment.
- Motivating students to do their best on assessment activities.
- Using assessment results to improve programs.
- Identifying methods to realistically measure outcomes.
|
|
45
|
- “The most important influence on the development of critical
thinking abilities is providing students with structured opportunities
to integrate information across courses and across in and out of class
activities.”
- Source: Pike, Gary. “Using Surveys to Measure Critical Thinking
Outcomes.” Assessment Update. May-June 1997, Vol. 9, No. 3.
|
|
46
|
- “One…conclusion we can make is that the impact of college is
largely determined by the individual’s quality of effort and level
of involvement in both academic and non-academic activities.”
- Source: Pascarella, Ernest and Patrick Terenzini. 1991. How College
Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
|
|
47
|
- “Anxiety, fear of failure, and low self-esteem are associated with
surface approaches to learning.”
- Entwhistle “urges university faculty to build up students’
sense of control over their work and get them to exercise responsibility
for their own learning.”
- Source: Marchese, Theodore. 1997. “The New Conversation about
Learning.” Assessing Impact. Washington, DC: Ammerican Association
for Higher Education.
|
|
48
|
- “Paul Ramsden has been able to identify characteristics of courses
in which students take a surface approach to learning: the courses
obsess over coverage; the huge amount of material they cram in precludes
opportunity to pursue topics in depth, students have little choice about
what and how to study; and such courses have a threatening.
Anxiety-riddled instructional and examining environment.”
- Source: Marchese, Theodore. 1997. “The New Conversation about
Learning.” Assessing Impact. Washington, DC: Ammerican Association
for Higher Education.
|
|
49
|
- “The more a teacher can emphasize:
- learner choice and feedback
- intrinsic motivators and natural curiosity
- rich, timely, usable feedback, coupled with occasions for reflection
|
|
50
|
- “The more a teacher can emphasize:
- Active involvement in real-world tasks,
- Emphasizing higher-order abilities done with other people in
high-challenge, low-threat environments that provide for practice and
reinforcement…the greater the chances he or she will realize the
deep learning that makes differences in student lives
- Source: Marchese, Theodore. 1997. “The New Conversation about
Learning.” Assessing Impact. Washington, DC: Ammerican Association
for Higher Education.
|
|
51
|
- “During their first year, however, they make gains to
approximately the same degree as their peers. However, their college
experiences including courses taken, hours spent studying, perceptions
of faculty, and experiences with racial/gender discrimination, are very
different from their more traditional peers.”
- “Students’ out-of-class and in-class experiences are
interrelated; both affect the student’s learning and development
- Source: NCTLA. http://cac.psu.edu/nctla/projects.html
|
|
52
|
- Learning communities involve student taking two or more courses (usually
general education courses) that link disciplines and explore a common
theme. They may involve students living together in communities in
residence halls.
- Learning communities have been implemented at Evergreen State College,
SUNY Stony Brook, University of Maryland-College Park, and Ball State
University.
|
|
53
|
- “Learning communities enhance communication between students and
faculty, help students build supportive relationships with their peers,
and result in greater perceived gains with respect to intellectual
development.”
- Source: Tinto, Vincent. “Classrooms as Communities: Exploring the
Education Character of Student Persistence.” Journal of Higher
Education. 1997, 68(6), 599-623.
|
|
54
|
- Research on the impact of additional learning strategies, such as
service learning, first year experience courses, study abroad,
team-taught courses, etc. are based on assessment results and have
implications for curriculum design.
|
|
55
|
|